Social Darwinism
Social Darwinism is a loose set of ideologies that emerged in the late 1800s in which Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection was used to justify certain political, social or economic views. Social Darwinists believe in “survival of the fittest”—the idea that certain people become powerful in society because they are innately better. Social Darwinism has been used to justify imperialism, racism, eugenics and social inequality at various times over the past century and a half.
It means that those who profess these beliefs don’t actually believe in them. Their practice suggests they believe in nothing more than “might is right” or social darwinism; or that it is their nation should dominate.
- Israel
- Zionism is not Judaism
- Zionists had to convince the Jews of the beliefs.
- Jewish well known slogan: “We are only a people because of our faith.”
- Until Zionism, nobody looked at Jews as a nationality.
- Zionists changed Jewish identity, self-image into a nationalistic one.
- Messiah will bring spirituality and humanity, not death and destruction
- What you see today, last time was seen in Nazi Germany.
- You take someone’s house and then you have the right to defend yourself.
- Solution
- A return to Judaism
- Two states will never succeed. Jews have to stay in exile until the coming of the messiah.
- Jews will be exiled, before the Messiah comes. It has been prophesized.
- It is up to us to help fulfil this prophecy.
- Help Jews by bringing a peaceful dismantlement of Israel.
- Zionism is not Judaism
- Low-cost high payoff approach – No ground troops plus a coalition for air support.
Panopticon
The Panopticon theory holds that people can be controlled when they believe themselves to be under constant surveillance even if no one is watching. The theory stems from the intended effect of having a central guard tower in a prison that all the prisoners could see, even though they could not see the guards.
Subverting Truth: Western media is rife with propaganda, racism & fear mongering
- Constant fear-mongering
- Fosters the myth of a clash of civilizations
- Israel is an outpost of Western Civilization in a sea of barbarism.
- Democracy, Decency and Honor vs Islamic Terrorism, Barbarism and Medievalism
- Not interested in the truth
- Israel supporters do not want to know the truth.
- Truth would force them to examine their materialism, racism, self-delusion and complicity in oppression, murder and genocide.
- Israel is sustained by lies
- That Israel supports an independent Palestinian state.
- That Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East.
- That Israel respects the rule of law and human rights.
Living in the West
Once a masjid is built, it means that a permanent Muslim community has been established.
- Means of influencing government for securing our rights:
- The vote
- A lobby
- Means of changing a democracy into an Islamic State:
- Dawah to the people
- Dawah to the leadership
Israel was founded on lies
- Israel was founded on lies
- That the land was unoccupied
- 750,000 Palestinians fled their homes during the ethnic cleansing.
- That it was the Arabs that started the 1948 war, in which Israel seized most of Palestine.
- That Israel faced annihilation in 1967, forcing it to seize the rest of Palestine and parts of the bordering states.
- The brazenness of Israel lies that characterizes despotic regimes
- From Israel politicians
- From Israeli media
- From Israeli controlled international news outlets
- It paints a picture that is diametrically opposed to reality.
- Their Alice in Wonderland lexicon
- Children killed by soldiers
- Children caught in the crossfire
- The bombing of an apartment building of civilians
- A surgical strike of a bomb-making factory
- The destruction of Palestinian homes
- The demolition of the homes of terrorists
- Children killed by soldiers
- Big lie
The deification of science
- Science as the ultimate source of truth: In the deification of science, science is seen as the ultimate source of truth and the only valid way of understanding the world. Any other way of knowing, such as intuition or religious belief, is dismissed as unscientific and therefore invalid.
- Scientists as infallible authorities: Scientists are often seen as infallible authorities, whose word is taken as gospel. This can lead to a cult of personality around certain scientists, where their ideas are accepted without question.
- Reductionism: In the deification of science, complex phenomena are reduced to their simplest components in order to be studied scientifically. This reductionism can lead to an oversimplification of complex issues and an underestimation of the interconnectedness of systems.
- Objectivity: Science is often seen as completely objective, free from any bias or subjectivity. However, science is not immune to biases, and the cultural, social, and political contexts in which research is conducted can influence scientific findings.
- Technology as the solution to all problems: In the deification of science, technology is seen as the solution to all problems, regardless of their cause or complexity. This can lead to a neglect of social, cultural, and political factors that may be contributing to a problem, and a focus on technological solutions that may not be effective or appropriate.
Evolution is a myth
- Abiogenesis – There are no experiments which shows that if we add certain organic molecules like ammonia or methane into water they will transform into a living cell. A biologist named Richard Lenski took commonly found bacteria called E.Coli bacteria, separated them into twelve flasks and observed their replication for two decades. There were some genetic changes observed in the later generations of bacteria over a period of two decades but all of them remained bacteria.
- Theory of homology – Genetic adaptation and mutation have proven to have fixed limits. Micro-evolution is a well-established scientific fact in the field of biology. Slight adaptations like shorter elephant tusks, bigger spots on the skin of a fish or larger heads of lizards due to change in environment is hardly a “proof” for major changes in anatomy, physiology and biochemistry of animals needed to transform them into animals belonging to a different phylum. Animals share very similar organ systems like respiratory, circulatory and digestive system and so evolutionary biologists have concluded that homology between animals represent evolution from a common ancestor. Well, one can argue that homology between animals can also represent a common Creator.
- Artificial Selection (Breeding) – Hundreds of different kinds of dogs have been produced via artificial selection/breeding. But through this process they all still remain dogs. They do not change into leopards or elephants or some other form of animal.
- Fossil Evidence – Where are the billions of missing links in the evolutionary chain. Rather than all life branching from a single organism, The Cambrian Explosion has revealed a forest of life from the very beginning. This sudden appearance of most major complex animal groups at the same low level of the fossil record is still an embarrassment to evolutionists.
- Natural Selection – Selection begins with the projection of volitional selective capacity onto nature to do something like “favour” or “weed out” organisms. Scientists should find this unsettling. While some religious practitioners ascribe free-will to inanimate things, how can selection ever legitimately be applied scientifically, to an immaterial concept or to mindless entities? Before Darwin, the ability to choose was largely confined to designing intelligences, that is, to conscious agents that could reflect deliberatively on the possible consequences of their choices. Only intelligent beings can make choices and decisions.
The Western Hearts and Minds campaign
- Romans did it.
- Americans don’t look at us as family, but they want us to look at them as family.
- They want your world view to be shaped by them.
- This was their most powerful weapon.
- The real occupation was the mental occupation.
- The slave thinks they part of the empire.
- When your enemy convinces you to dress like them, talk like them, become like them.
- What have you been worshipping? Golden cows.
- We can think for ourselves
- We can express ourselves
- We are not loyal to anything but the truth.
- We can invite the world to see the truth.
- They want to make us feel ashamed, inferior and guilty of our own history and our own Prophet.
Secularism – The ideology that separates man from God
- Nature of Reality (Ontology)
- Materialist Worldview: This worldview posits that reality is solely composed of physical matter and energy. It is grounded in a scientific and empirical understanding of the universe, where everything can be explained through natural laws and observable phenomena. Human beings are considered products of biological evolution and their destiny is largely shaped by physical and social environments. Concepts like free will and consciousness are seen as emergent properties of the brain.
- The modernist mentality breaks off the ontological bond between man and nature and therefore eliminates the ethical responsibility of man toward nature, the spirit (man) that the Quran educates does not regard himself outside nature.
- Nature of Knowledge (Epistemology)
- The Quran has it’s own epistemology which is not reliant on Hellenistic and other philosophies.
- Secular ideology believes that all knowledge is subjective, so it does not recognize any knowledge as objective or as absolute truth.
- “There is no such thing as absolute truth” is a self-refuting claim.
- Falsehood, by it’s nature is bound to perish.
- Falsehood is incoherent
- Divine Law (Ethical Standards)
- Man broke off all of the ethical bonds that the divine law imposed for his benefit and discarded them. Thus, he claimed that he would be free by disobeying Allah and that he would prove his power by using nature as he wished and oppressing his fellow beings that were weaker than him. He idolized his soul and started to be a slave of his soul and worship its desires and wishes; he made it the goal of his life to satisfy the desires of his soul, to establish domination and take pleasure.
- Democracy means the elected representatives of the society, determines the law.
- In Islam, Allah’s Laws determine the society, rather than society determining what the laws should be.
- Law and Governance:
- Materialist Worldview: Legal and governance systems are based on secular principles, with laws developed through human reasoning and democratic processes. The focus is on creating systems that promote social order, justice, and individual rights.
- Islamic Worldview: Law and governance are based on Sharia, which encompasses both religious and secular aspects of life. The legal system aims to implement divine justice and ensure that societal norms align with Islamic teachings.
- Basis of Morality:
- Materialist Worldview: Morality is often seen as a human construct, developed through social, cultural, and evolutionary processes. Ethical principles are derived from human experience, consensus, and rational deliberation.
- Islamic Worldview: Morality is based on divine commandments and the teachings of Islam. Ethical principles are derived from the Quran, the Hadith, and Islamic jurisprudence (Sharia), which provide clear guidelines for right and wrong.
- Purpose of Life:
- Materialist Worldview: Life’s purpose is often viewed in terms of personal fulfillment, happiness, and the pursuit of knowledge. Meaning is self-determined and can be based on individual or collective goals.
- Islamic Worldview: The purpose of life is to worship Allah, follow His commandments, and lead a life in accordance with Islamic principles. This includes striving for moral and spiritual development, serving humanity, and preparing for the afterlife.
- Colonialism
- Their media narratives are colonial and condescending.
The rise of nationalism
- Always linked to the systems failing the masses
- The locals always end up blaming the foreigners.
- Submission to Allah and allowing Shariah to protect the society.
- Materialism is purposeless and tends to neglect moral virtue
- The real division is our moral criterion and foundation, not ethnicity
Islam
The decline of Islamic civilization
The main assumption is that the decline of Islamic civilization was due to the traditional Muslim understanding of Islam. This is easily refuted when we consider that during the first 500 years of ‘traditional Islam’ Muslims were technologically, militarily and economically the most advanced in the world. Democracy is 1000 years older than Islam, yet no one believes that implementing it will send people back to the age of worshipping Zeus. Political systems are timeless, because they merely describe a set of relationships between humans, not a technological tool or piece of equipment.
The deification of science
The misapplication of science, by mostly Christian thinkers upon the study of human political and social organization produced a materialistic world-view based upon a ‘natural law’ morality, borrowed from parts of Christian tradition, which would later become Liberalism and Secularism. Western civilization adopts as its basis the separation of religion from life’s affairs is contradictory to man’s nature, thus giving no weight to the spiritual aspect in society, and it views life as only benefit and makes the attainment of benefit as the foundation for the relationship between men. Hence, it is natural for any good morals to be shunned in life in the same way that the spiritual values were neglected, and life established upon competition, struggle, aggression and colonialism.
Christianity and Judaism were liberalized due to their priests enforcing arbitrary laws with no basis in revelation. The campaign to liberalize Islam has been met with heavy resistance, due to Muslims closely holding on to the final immutable divine revelation, the Holy Quran.
The fact that Western democracy deliberately or ignorantly fails to address the question of spirituality as a primary focus in human life, makes all its ideas to become fallacious, deceptive, and reductionist. In contrast, Islam is the most perfect and most comprehensive political way of life, a fully-detailed and all-encompassing principle upon which all the nations can found their system of social, economic, and political life.
The main assumption is that the decline of Islamic civilization was due to the traditional Muslim understanding of Islam. This is easily refuted when we consider that during the first 500 years of ‘traditional Islam’ Muslims were technologically, militarily and economically the most advanced in the world.
Democracy is 1000 years older than Islam, yet no one believes that implementing it will send people back to the age of worshipping Zeus. Political systems are timeless, because they merely describe a set of relationships between humans, not a technological tool or piece of equipment.
The ‘threat’ of Islam according to the Secular Liberal world-view, is not that it would convert the world by force, but that it was a competitor to Liberalism, in offering the world a way of life. In response, Islam would have to be defeated, but not by directly destroying the books from where it came, since that was impossible. Liberalism would, using intellectual, cultural and military assault, create a change of political system in Muslim lands, and render Islam obsolete from political life. To achieve this, they spread a notably new type of Western concept which would create a sectarianism designed to overcome the bonds of Muslim brotherhood (Ummah) upon which Ottoman political attachment rested.
This new and artificial sectarianism would be known as nationalism, which would detach completely the various Muslim lands from control by the Caliph.
The entity of the State is a host of concepts, criteria and convictions and a group of people bound together by the authority. Thus, if these concepts, criteria and convictions were demolished among the Muslims, the entity of the State would be demolished as well. Had it not been for this cultural and legislative invasion, the Kufr states would not have been able to deal the Islamic State the fatal blow, succeeding in dividing the Muslims through nationalism, especially Turkish and Arab nationalism. The legislative invasion of the State in the ruling system and the laws unsettled the Aqeedah of the Muslims and rocked the Islamic thoughts in the minds of many Muslims.
When the industrial revolution in Europe emerged in a remarkable manner that had a profound impact on the states powers. Muslims stood idle and confused by this revolution, hence the balance of power in the world changed and the Islamic state began her slide from the leading spot gradually, until eventually she became the coveted object of the greedy. Hence, she started evacuating the lands she had conquered and the lands which had been previously under her authority. The disbelieving countries started usurping from her the land of Islam piece by piece, and this marked the start of the ebb and the end of the tide for the Muslims. Since then, the European countries started to focus upon the removal of the Islamic State from the international scene, and upon the complete removal of Islam from life’s affairs and from the relationships between people.
Clash of civilizations
- Conflict between Western individualistic culture and Arabic communal culture
- The conflict of civilizations has been transposed into a conflict between Christianity and Islam.
- In order to resolve religious conflict, secularism has been introduced in the West.
- Western Christianity is based on the model of democracy that erroneously conceives of itself as being devoid of religious values.
- Social policy making and services such as education, health and poverty alleviation are left to the state which claims to be neutral.
- In Western democracy, religious affiliation is subordinate to citizenship, as the state is the final authority – a civil religion.
- The role of the state in the West whose role it is to guard against radicalization.
- The role of the state in Islam is to guard against Islamic secularism.
- Capitalists in control
- Under a capitalist democracy, it’s the funders and lobbies that control.
- American Jingoism
- Extreme patriotism, especially in the form of aggressive or warlike foreign policy.
True freedom of religion
Under Shariah, Non-Muslims can set up courts and govern themselves according their own religions. Their laws will be respected.
Unlike Western Christianity, Islam is a holistic personal and social religion
Unlike Western Christianity, Islam is timeless
The main assumption is that Muslim decline is due to the traditional Muslim understanding of Islam. This is easily refuted when we consider that during the first 500 years of ‘traditional Islam’ Muslims were technologically, militarily and economically the most advanced in the world – innovating many new technologies and expanding the boundaries of human knowledge. The fact that Muslims believed in hudud punishments, the traditional family, or wearing turbans and having beards didn’t limit their cultural advancement in the slightest. Consequently, the main problem of the Muslim world is not getting rid of ‘medieval laws’ but to rediscover of the same spirit and state of mind that motivated our ancestors to advance in all spheres of life. The Islamic political system is not limited to only being implemented using medieval technology, but can be implemented using modern technology! Systems don’t change, technology changes. Democracy is 1000 years older than Islam, yet no one believes that implementing it will send people back to the age of wearing togas and worshipping Zeus! Political systems are timeless, because they merely describe a set of relationships between humans, not a technological tool or piece of equipment.A detachment of Islam from political life would cause it to die
