O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. And if you disagree over anything, refer it to Allāh and the Messenger, if you should believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is the best [way] and best in result.
[4:59]
A leader is a shepherd
- He directs his flock to green pastures.
- He’s got sheep dogs to protect the flock.
- No separation of authority from divinity. One god, one government.
- Allah is also our law giver
- Challenging the oppressive power structures of the world
- Two thirds of verses revealed were revealed in makkah, about the false power structures.
Syria
- Syria has got a false government that does not represent it’s people, but it is used for the liberation of Palestine.
- False government to be used for the purpose of Haqq.
- True government to be used for the purpose of Baatil.
United Nations is a tool
- America uses it when it suits them. Other wise they act unilaterally.
- Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council.
- The premier international institution, which in dire need of reform. It should be fit for purpose, more democratic and more effective.
- United Nations was put in place in order to settle disputes. Gaza has proven that the global order is ineffective at achieving justice and peace.
Islamic Democracy
- Public acceptance of founding the religious political system
- Hold a referendum on the foundation of the Islamic State.
- Public acceptance of Constitution based on observing Islamic rules
- The Constitution must be quickly ratified by the majority of the nation in a direct referendum.
- The Constitution must insist on Islamic Law in governing the nation with dependence on public voice.
- Equal and free political participation
- As per the right for equal and free political participation provided in the Constitution, minorities, women and religious minorities have a fair position in this system.
- Supervisory Mechanisms
- Internal mechanisms
- Decisions and actions are taken by virtue of the legal authority
- External mechanisms:
- Supervisory organizations
- Press
- Political parties
- Civil institutions
- Internal mechanisms
- Relation between Religious Law and voice of majority
- Since ruling is only for God, the question is how to avoid contradiction with the principle of legislation by public representatives?
- Regulations approved by representatives are further discussed by Jurisprudents in the Guardian Council for any inconsistency with Islamic rules.
- Thus in fields with no clear religious rule, including a vast part of issues, the voice of majority and reasoning by experts plays an important role.
- Since ruling is only for God, the question is how to avoid contradiction with the principle of legislation by public representatives?
We are commanded to establish a responsible and capable leader
Allah commands you to deliver trusts to those worthy of them; and when you judge between people, to judge with justice.
Excellent is the admonition Allah gives you. Allah is All-Hearing, All-Seeing.
(4:58)
Here the Muslims are forewarned against the evils which had afflicted the Israelites. One of the fundamental mistakes committed by the Israelites was that in the time of their degeneration they had handed over positions of trust ( i.e. religious and political leadership ) to incompetent, mean, immoral, dishonest and corrupt people. The result was that corruption spread throughout the nation.
The Muslims are directed to take heed of this, and to entrust positions of responsibility only to those who are capable of shouldering the burdens of such positions. The other major weakness of the Israelites was that they completely lost their sense of justice. In their pursuit of either personal or national interests, honesty and justice were often sacrificed.
Tafseer Tafheem-ul-Quran Syed Abu-al-A’la Maududi
The group that will appoint the Caliph (Ahlu al-Hall wal-‘Aqd)
A decision-making Muslim committee qualified to elect or depose a caliph on behalf of the Muslim community, which statespersons, scholars, leaders, politicians, and prominent figures are represented. Members must meet three qualification requirements, as stated in al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah by Al-Mawardi:
- Integrity of which all requirements are met.
- The knowledge needed to make right decisions as to who should be the Muslim ruler according to the requirements needed for such a position.
- Reasoning and discretion that enable them to choose the right person who qualifies for ruling the Muslims and taking care of their interests.
The leaders are a reflection of their followers
“Allah has promised to those among you who believe and do righteous deeds that He will assuredly make them to succeed (the present) rulers and grant them vicegerency in the land just as He made those before them to succeed (others)” This verse makes it clear that all believers have been conferred upon the Caliphate and not a special class or dynasty. Moreover, the Caliphate granted by Allah to the faithful is the popular vicegerency and not a limited one and thus it is run with the consent of the people.
An Islamic State is a theocracy
It is duty bound to make itself an efficient organ for transforming the high ideals of Islam into reality.
Jesus said: “The Kingdom of Heaven is within you.” Islam fully subscribes to this view, since no just kingdom can be founded on earth by unjust men, who have not first created the Kingdom of Heaven in their hearts, but Islam goes a step forward and says that the creation of the Kingdom of Heaven within heart is not enough; this Kingdom of Heaven within must be externalized into a Kingdom of Heaven on earth, so that the organized life of man may be built up on the basis of love, fraternity and justice.
Even a lowliest villager could dare tell the Commander of the Faithful that he would set him straight like a spindle if he deviates an inch from the path of righteousness. This shows that the rulers and the officials in the Islamic State are answerable both to God and man for their actions, and the people have every right to criticize, not only their public behavior, but even their private activities.
It is in this sense alone that state in Islam is a theocracy, not in the sense that it is headed by a representative of God on earth who can always hide his despotic will behind his supposed infallibility. An Islamic State is, therefore, theocratic in one aspect as it is run according to God-given laws, but it is altogether a different theocracy of which Europe has had the bitter experience and in which, a priestly clan is sharply marked off from the rest of the population and exercises an unchecked domination and enforces laws of its own making in the name of God, and thus imposes its own godhood upon the common people. The priest puts himself as a mediator between the masses and the unseen God. Such a system is quite un-Islamic.
The theocracy built by Islam is not ruled by a particular religious class, but by the whole community of Muslims including the rank and file as Allah has not appointed a particular individual, group, race or class as the representative of the Real Sovereign upon the earth, but the whole community.
The person who is covetous of leadership is unfit for it
In the context of such heavy responsibilities the heading of the Islamic State or assumption of any other important portfolio in its set-up is a very difficult job so much so that that Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) compared it to the slaughtering of one with a blunt knife. No person, therefore. who is conscious of the responsibilities of the job, covets to assume that; he rather shirks it and accepts it only when he is compelled to do so. The Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) declared that person to be quite unfit for office in an Islamic State who is covetous of it, as he is either ignorant of its grave responsibilities or desires to take undue advantage of his official power.
Cannot enjoin good and forbid evil without power.
Without authority, the Shariah becomes disfigured. No jama’ah without an authoritative government.
Obey those in authority – Our responsibility to establish an authority.
- Khilafah
- Muslims are one unit
- Islamic values take precedence
- The pillars of government are ruler, justice and obedience
- A government led by rulers who are given absolute freedom to run sharia
- The government system is conditional
- Deliberation between the people and the authorities
- The caliph in the khilafah system is a person who represents the people in government
- To carry out Islamic law
International Islamic Court of Justice (IICJ)
A new alliance of Islamic States
- An alliance would empower states to take unified action, without the risk of repercussions.
- Seek alliances with other nations or groups to bolster your position.
- Alliances can provide additional resources, strategic positions, and divide the attention of the opponent.
Appointing a Caliph is Fard Khifayah
- The leadership is the greatest of wajibaat of the religion.
- The religion cannot be established, accept through it.
- It is obligatory to submit to a just Imam.
Ahlu al-Hall wal-‘Aqd (The group that will appoint the Caliph)
A decision-making Muslim committee qualified to elect or depose a caliph on behalf of the Muslim community, which statespersons, scholars, leaders, politicians, and prominent figures are represented. Members must meet three qualification requirements, as stated in al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah by Al-Mawardi:
- Integrity of which all requirements are met.
- The knowledge needed to make right decisions as to who should be the Muslim ruler according to the requirements needed for such a position.
- Reasoning and discretion that enable them to choose the right person who qualifies for ruling the Muslims and taking care of their interests.
- In order for a religious law to be enforced, you require a government.
- Government is the management of society
- Government is part of the Islamic Way of Life.
- You cannot expect to benefit from the much needed justice of the law, without enforcing it.
- Don’t think for a second that the religion is not there to be enforced.
- In Islam, the masjid and the government cannot be separate.
- Islam is the foundation and the government is the guard.
Rights and duties of the citizens
- Loyalty from all its citizens
- Wholehearted cooperation in all sectors of life
- Complete obedience to the law of the land
- The commands of the rulers so long as they are in comformity with the Laws of the Shari’ah.
- Where the rulers transgress the limits, the citizens have the right:
- To withdraw co-operation
- To check the rulers from acting against the Commands of Allah and His Apostle (may peace be upon him).
The citizens are also required to pay taxes due to the State quite willingly and not to misappropriate its funds, and to participate in Jihad in any capacity for which they are deemed fit by the authorities of the Islamic State.
Rights and duties of the the Islamic State
“The Head of state is the guardian of him, who has nobody to support him” (Abu Dawud, al-Tirmidhi).”
- Protect the life, property and honour of every citizen, irrespective of his caste, creed, colour, religion or social status.
- Protect the freedom and individual liberty of every citizen so long as there is no valid reason to curtail it. It cannot be done as an arbitrary act. The State is authorised to lay hands upon it through due process of law.
- Protect the freedom of expression is one of the fundamental rights of the citizen which an Islamic State must respect.
- No citizen remains unprovided for in respect of the basic necessities of life, viz, food, clothing, shelter, medical aid and education.
- To create such conditions in which the good reigns supreme in the society and evil is suppressed and exterminated, and its citizens learn to live as good Muslims.
Muslim Nations Security Council
- Purpose
- To consolidate our political, economic and military power.
- To pursue goals which are vital to the Muslim Ummah.
- To use our power as leverage to trade with various power blocs to achieve our political goals.
- Ideology: Islam
- Political Hierarchy: Islamic Democracy
- The Shura Governing model
- Sovereignty belongs to the Shariah, means potential leaders are selected that meet the necessary Shariah qualifications.
- Power belongs to the people, meaning that the people elect the leader, from approved candidates.
- The Shura Governing model
- Wealth Distribution: Islamic Tax
- Zakaat is a wealth tax, which redistributes wealth from the wealthy to the poor.
- Core Values
- Truth
- Islam: Quran & Sunnah
- Justice
- International Shariah Court
- And whoever does not judge by what Allaah has revealed, such are the kaafiroon (disbelievers)” [al-Maa’idah 5:44]
- International Shariah Court
- Truth
- Political Hierarchy: Islamic Democracy
- Economic Benefits
- An alliance would empower states to take unified action, without the risk of repercussions.
- Alliances can provide additional resources, strategic positions, and divide the attention of the opponent
- A Free trade agreement could boost the economies of member nations.
- Research and development of mutual economic capabilities.
- Research and development of mutual military capabilities.
- Research and development in creating a new gold-backed reserve currency.
- Reaching agreements with BRICS to work towards mutual currency independence.
- An alternative international financial system would neutralize Western sanctions.
- Security Benefits
- The world needs new global law enforcers
- Foster genuine yearning for unity and mutual cooperation among Muslims.
- Don’t fall for extremists calls to repeat history.
- Willing to represent and defend the Muslims
- Working with the Axis of Resistance in order to offer support to Palestine.
- Research and development of biotechnology capabilities, in order to effectively deal with the next pandemic.
- Research and alignment of foreign policies.
- Lending support to Islamic governments and Muslim citizens which are being oppressed or attacked.
- Lending support to Islamic governments and Muslim citizens which are under the poverty line.
- The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that opposes European colonialism in the Western Hemisphere. It holds that any intervention in the political affairs of the Americas by foreign powers is a potentially hostile act against the United States.
- Potential Members
- Palestine
- Hamas
- Palestinian Authority
- All other factions
- Qatar
- The Muslim Brotherhood
- Muslim Jihadi groups
- Türkiye
- Neo-Ottomanism
- Turkey’s nostalgia for the Ottoman Empire and desire to become a regional power.
- The center of power shifted to an Islamically-oriented political elite.
- The identity of the Turkish state has shifted to one that is sensitive to Islamism.
- The heir of the Ottoman Empire holds a particular moral responsibility for the Muslims in the former Ottoman territories.
- Independence from NATO
- The decision makers in Ankara have concluded that US policies more often aggravate than resolve instability in the region, which, in turn, has lengthened the distance from the US-led alliance. Moreover, Ankara is emboldened by its economic growth and its developing national military industry to pursue an autonomous foreign policy.
- Many Turks believe that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) failed to support the democratic government in Turkey nor has it offered much meaningfully assistance in the struggle against both PKK and ISIS terrorism.
- Neo-Ottomanism
- Lebanon
- Afghanistan
- Mali
- Senegal
- Niger
- The Sokoto Caliphate in northern Nigeria
- Brunei
- Indonesia
- Malaysia
- Tajikistan
- Turkmenistan
- Uzbekistan
- Chechnya
- Extreme & Sectarian States
- The Iranian push for a pro-Shia leader in Syria, led to the displacement of 12 million Syrians.
- The Axis of Resistance
- The Saudi push for a pro-Sunni leader in Yemen, has led to the displacement of 4 million Yemenis.
- States such as Iran and Saudi Arabia rhetorically call for Muslim unity through institutions, conferences, publications, and funding while pursuing their foreign policy objectives.
- The Iranian push for a pro-Shia leader in Syria, led to the displacement of 12 million Syrians.
- Palestine
The Russian Power Bloc
- Ideology: Theism
- Political Hierarchy: Consultative Democracy
- Consultative democracy means that people can engage with the policies of the government at every level of society, and they are being consulted at every level.
- Wealth Distribution: Socialist Market Economy
- The system is a market economy with the predominance of public ownership and state-owned enterprises.
- Core Values
- China is opposed to the use of human rights and democracy as a political tool to interfere in other countries.
- “China is firm in supporting the international system with the UN at its core,” and opposes hegemony, power politics, unilateralism, and a Cold War mentality.
- Establishing systems and multi-lateral institutions of public benefit.
- Working for a truly stable international order
- Purpose of BRICS: “A small number of countries have arbitrarily imposed illegal and unilateral sanctions, severely undermining the harmony and stability of international relations.” Mr. Han encouraged the international community to jointly resist such acts.
- Political Hierarchy: Consultative Democracy
- Foreign Policy: Contributions
- Development should be at the center of the international agenda, with “win-win outcomes”.
- China is a natural member of the Global South, firm in upholding their legitimate rights and interests.
- Determined to stop the advancement of Western-style democracy, using democratic slogans to destabilize sovereign states and advance American geopolitical interests.
- No nation wants to risk direct conflict with any of the UN Security Council Members, especially America and China. They prefer fighting through proxies.
- Core Members
- China
- Russia
- Chechnya
- Syria
- Enter Russia on September 30, 2015, and all this changed. Russia decided it was not going to allow another government to be overthrown through Western conspiracy.While we fully support the right of the Syrian people to have their own representative government, the issue in Syria has gone beyond that. What is underway is no longer about the rights of the Syrian people. At one stage there were over 40 different groupings in Syria. Al-Assad had been receiving very little assistance from Iran or Hezbollah with the exception of advisors, this being the price he paid for not following their wise and astute advice given with sincerity.In August 2012 a report by Reuters confirmed what analysts had been speculating from the beginning, that the rebels in Syria were being supported by the hegemonic powers. The report stated “Obama’s order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence ‘finding,’ broadly permits the CIA and other US agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Asad.” The aim underpinning support for the rebels was evident from an interview conducted with a key FSA figure by the Israeli publication, Israel Hayom. The rebel identified only by an alias Kamal, stated, “Al-Asad’s fall will eliminate the link in the chain that ties Iran with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Not only would you be rid of an enemy, but you [Israel] would also weaken two others.”Islamists on Iran’s border
- Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah joined the fight. All three knew that if Syria fell, their own nations would be next on the regime-changers agenda.
- Speaking on CNN’s Amanpour show last week, Defense Minister Ehud Barak argued that “the toppling down of Assad will be a major blow to the radical axis, major blow to Iran and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza.”
- Islamists on Israel’s border
- Like in Libya and Egypt, the US doesn’t want to see the rise of an Islamic government, and the US knew that if Assad collapses too quickly, the ensuing chaos would see Islamic groups rise and take over a strategic part of the Middle East, which they also see as threatening to Israel’s borders (which Assad had helped keep quiet and peaceful).
- Fight until exhaustion
- The picture that emerges is that neither the US nor Russia wants al-Asad to succeed completely. They both want fighting to continue to exhaust government forces to the point that the government would be forced to accept a ceasefire on the terms dictated by the two powers. Russia and the US have agreed on a new constitution for Syria that they want to put to a vote. The constitution calls for devolution of power, a pluralistic society and system and elections in 18 months.
- Genocide
- Many drawing parallels between Israel’s punishing blockade of Gaza with Syria’s siege of the Yarmouk refugee camp, which brought the Palestinian population there to the brink of starvation.
- Enter Russia on September 30, 2015, and all this changed. Russia decided it was not going to allow another government to be overthrown through Western conspiracy.While we fully support the right of the Syrian people to have their own representative government, the issue in Syria has gone beyond that. What is underway is no longer about the rights of the Syrian people. At one stage there were over 40 different groupings in Syria. Al-Assad had been receiving very little assistance from Iran or Hezbollah with the exception of advisors, this being the price he paid for not following their wise and astute advice given with sincerity.In August 2012 a report by Reuters confirmed what analysts had been speculating from the beginning, that the rebels in Syria were being supported by the hegemonic powers. The report stated “Obama’s order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence ‘finding,’ broadly permits the CIA and other US agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Asad.” The aim underpinning support for the rebels was evident from an interview conducted with a key FSA figure by the Israeli publication, Israel Hayom. The rebel identified only by an alias Kamal, stated, “Al-Asad’s fall will eliminate the link in the chain that ties Iran with Hezbollah in Lebanon. Not only would you be rid of an enemy, but you [Israel] would also weaken two others.”Islamists on Iran’s border
- North Korea
- Iran
- Strategic interests (Power)
- Strong regional Allies
- No enemy forces in the region
- Iran wants a cold war with Israel
- Iran wants no war and no peace
- Iran want to establish deterrence, without any escalations into war.
- Just to demonstrate their ability to hurt their enemies, without doing so.
- Terms used: Strategic Patience, Heroic Flexibility
- A cold war is a state of conflict between nations that does not involve direct military action but is pursued primarily through economic and political actions, propaganda, acts of espionage or proxy wars waged by surrogates.
- Iran’s nuclear program appears to most Israeli’s as an existential threat
- “Negotiations will not stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program.”
- An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well.
- If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.
- Turning people’s political solidarity into religious affiliation
- “We,” Ghuzlan wrote, “agree with the essence of Qaradawi’s critique of the Shia. The Brotherhood prefers not to enter into religious polemics in order to preserve the unity of the Muslim Nation, but Iran should respect that approach too and not take advantage of it by acting to spread Shiism.”
- The Axis of Resistance
- The Axis of Resistance dominates Israel’s foreign policy
- Iraq
- The disastrous arms-for-hostages policy convinced Iraqis rightly that the United States was trying to play both sides of the conflict. Both Iraqis and Iranians came to believe the United States was manipulating each of them during the war.
- President George W. Bush toppled Saddam and ended his brutal dictatorship, but in doing so, Bush opened the door to a Shia majority government which is much friendlier to Tehran than to Riyadh or Amman, or Washington. These are sobering reminders of the unintended consequences of wars.
- Iraq’s post-American power-sharing arrangement grants winners and losers alike shares of government power; this system promotes corruption and bad governance, but it also makes it difficult for a single authoritarian to ever take full control of state resources.
- Hamas & PIJ
- Both Hamas and Islamic Jihad publicly thanked Islamic Iran for giving them real (material) help on the ground
- Yemen
- Ansar Allah
- Lebanon
- Strategic interests (Power)
The American Power Bloc
- Ideology: Materialism
- Political Hierarchy: Plutocracy
- A state or society governed by the wealthy.
- Stability is achieved through democratic competition between corrupt parties
- Wealth Distribution: Capitalism
- Government taxes the rich and poor equally.
- Taxes are attached to most goods and services.
- Owners of capital borrow capital to the Employers of capital.
- Core Values
- Anti-Religion, Anti-Islam, Atheism – Ignores God’s Law. Prefers to place men as lords over others.
- Inaccurate worldviews on men, women, society, life and nature.
- Racist, Greedy, Ruthless, Oppressive, Materialistic
- Materialism: In a society in which materialism is given the highest value, all human values are sacrificed at it’s altar.
- Political Hierarchy: Plutocracy
- Foreign Policy: Contributions
- Media & Freedom [Psychological Control]
- Banking – Giving large unpayable loans [Financial Control]
- Instruments of War [Political Control]
- Human Trafficking
- Human Organ Trafficking
- Foreign Policy: Natural Resource Adventures
- Division
- Leaderless and endless transitions
- Playing opponents against each other
- Exploiting Weak and Divided Governments
- Anarchy
- Imposed Autocracies
- America executed over 72 regime change operations.
- The two-state solution proposed by Saudi Arabia, despite its meager demands, and even though it is giving up most of historical Palestine, is rejected by the Israeli entity in all its sects, right, and left, above and below.
- Natural Resource Exploitation
- Extract cheap natural resources.
- Open markets for expensive finished goods
- Maintaining a forward military posture through Israel and regional military bases.
- War (When the oppressed are resisting)
- Genocide is the foundation of Western Domination
- They drop all pretense of the Western so-called civilizing mission
- They drop all pretense of our moral superiority
- They become the most ruthless and efficient killers on the planet.
- They become the beast, they accuse the oppressed of being.
- The humanitarians insist we bomb other nations, because we embody goodness.
- Division
- Core Members
- American, British & German Christian and Jewish Elite
- Israel
- Israel is the defender of American foreign policy in the Middle East
- Israeli presence in the Middle East would reduce the cost of US presence in the region.
- The special nature of the U.S.-Israel alliance has resulted in special protection of and impunity for Israel in international arenas.
- Saudi Arabia
- Anti-Islam
- Saudi Arabia has labeled Hamas a terrorist organization. This is fundamentally linked to the kingdom’s stance on political Islam and view of Hamas as an extension of the Muslim Brotherhood, which Saudi Arabia has opposed since the Arab Spring.
- Saudis are never to use oil production as a political weapon.
- Saudi bases used against Iraq.
- Israel Normalization
- Saudi circles advocate for Tel Aviv as a part of its regional security and economic system.
- One of Saudi Arabia’s conditions for normalizing relations with “Israel” was a defense treaty with the United States.
- Saudi Arabia faces difficulty in normalizing its relations with the Israeli entity due to the so-called “Arab street’s” continued opposition to such a step.
- Egypt
- “The extent of Egypt’s ruling establishment’s self-prostitution to Saudi money is both embarrassing and unsurprising,” commented the writer Iyad al-Baghdadi Palestine.
- Pakistan
- Pakistani air bases were used against Afghanistan.
- Anti-Islam
- United Arab Emirates
- Ayatollah Khamenei strongly condemned the UAE-Israel normalization, calling it a “betrayal” of the Muslim world
- Bahrain
- Jordan
- Oman